Swiftron
Unlock Your Full Potential with AI.
Our AI-powered Prompt Optimizer applies proven techniques to refine GPT models for more precise results. Each technique is highlighted in a distinct color for easy identification.
Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on text comprehension to respond to your prompts. Each word triggers related words that unlock different knowledge domains. A clear, precise prompt with strategic word choice can activate powerful knowledge areas, leading to better results.
The Persona Pattern guides the AI by adopting a specific tone, character, or role in prompts, thereby shaping responses with a consistent and coherent personality. This technique allows users to define the AI's perspective, ensuring that the output aligns with a particular stance or style. The Persona can be expressed through a profession, title, fictional character, or even a historical figure. This approach tailors interactions, making the AI's responses more relevant and engaging based on the persona selected.
The Chain-of-Thought (CoT) approach builds on a series of interconnected prompts to guide the AI's responses in a coherent and contextually connected manner. This technique fosters nuanced and focused interactions by gradually expanding on related topics. Each prompt in the sequence adds depth and clarity to the conversation, leading to more detailed and structured outputs. When applying this pattern, it is crucial to ensure that each prompt logically follows the previous one, maintaining a clear and progressive line of thought.
The Tree-of-Thought (ToT) pattern is a powerful prompt technique designed to achieve comprehensive exploration and understanding of a complex topic through collaborative contributions. The process involves multiple 'experts,' each contributing sequential steps to build on the previous ideas. If an expert realizes an error in their contribution, they are removed from the process, ensuring the final understanding is both accurate and in-depth. This pattern is particularly effective in situations where diverse perspectives and thorough examination are required.
The Recipe Pattern is a powerful technique used to generate a sequence of steps required to achieve a specific goal, particularly when the user has a partial understanding of the necessary steps. The user provides known steps or 'ingredients,' and the pattern fills in missing steps, organizes them in the correct order, and identifies any unnecessary actions. This pattern leverages the model's expertise to create a complete and efficient process, making it ideal for complex planning and problem-solving scenarios.
The Template Pattern ensures that the output generated by the LLM (ChatGPT) follows a specific structure or template. This is particularly useful when the output needs to adhere to a predetermined format, such as a blog article, direct mail, or any structured document. The LLM may not inherently know the desired structure, so you provide instructions on how each element should appear within the output. By defining placeholders for different sections of content and requesting the LLM to fit the generated content into these placeholders, you can ensure that the output conforms to the required template.
The Flipped Interaction Pattern is a strategy where the language model (LLM) asks the user a series of questions to gather sufficient information to achieve a specific goal. This approach is particularly useful when the user has a defined objective but may not know all the details needed to craft an optimal prompt. The model drives the conversation by asking targeted questions, allowing it to gather the necessary information and complete the task effectively. The user can specify how many questions should be asked at a time, and the interaction continues until the goal is met or the conditions are satisfied.
The Question Refinement Pattern integrates the capabilities of an LLM (Language Model) into the prompt-engineering process, aiming to continuously suggest potentially improved or refined questions that a user could ask. This pattern is particularly valuable when the user may not be an expert in a particular field and might struggle to formulate the most effective question. By using this pattern, the LLM aids the user in identifying the right questions to obtain accurate answers. The process often involves contextual statements where the LLM is instructed to suggest better versions of the user's questions or prompt the user to use these refined versions. This pattern can also be extended by asking the LLM to generate follow-up questions, thereby narrowing down the focus of the original query and improving the overall quality of interaction.
The Meta Language Creation Pattern allows the user to define an alternative, custom language or notation for interaction with a Large Language Model (LLM). This pattern involves explaining the semantics of this new language to the LLM so that future prompts using this language can be understood and processed accurately. The core idea is to map specific symbols, words, or structures in the new language to concepts or actions in the LLM, ensuring that the model can interpret and act upon these custom prompts effectively. This approach is particularly useful when conventional languages like English may not offer the precision or clarity needed for specific tasks.
The Output Automater Pattern is designed to facilitate the generation of scripts or other automation artifacts by a language model (LLM). This pattern allows the LLM to automatically execute recommended steps that can otherwise be tedious and error-prone when performed manually. By specifying the context and the type of automation artifact, such as a Python script, users can streamline repetitive tasks, enhance efficiency, and ensure accurate execution of instructions.
The Alternative Approaches Pattern aims to encourage users of large language models (LLMs) to explore various methods for completing a task. This pattern addresses cognitive biases that lead individuals to favor familiar strategies, which may not always be the most effective. By presenting alternative approaches, it fosters a broader understanding of problem-solving and helps users evaluate their options critically. Key components of this pattern include contextual statements that prompt the LLM to list alternatives, compare their pros and cons, and potentially incorporate the original method suggested by the user.
The Cognitive Verifier Pattern is designed to enhance the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by requiring them to decompose an original question into several smaller, related questions. This approach helps ensure that the final answer is comprehensive and well-informed. When a user poses a question, the LLM generates a set of additional questions that clarify context, explore specific areas, or gather necessary information to provide a more accurate response. Once the user answers these questions, the LLM combines the individual answers to formulate a cohesive and complete answer to the original query.
The Fact Check List Pattern is designed to ensure that the language model (LLM) generates a list of fundamental facts that are essential to the output provided. This list allows users to verify the underlying assumptions and facts upon which the output is based. By reviewing these facts, users can exercise due diligence to validate the accuracy of the information presented, particularly in cases where the LLM may generate convincing but factually incorrect content.
The Infinite Generation Pattern allows for the automatic generation of a series of outputs, potentially infinite, without requiring the user to re-enter the generation prompt each time. This pattern is designed to reduce input efforts based on the assumption that users do not want to continuously input the same prompt. The user retains a base template but can add variations through additional inputs before each generated output. The motivation behind this pattern is that many tasks require repeated application of the same prompt to multiple concepts. Repeatedly entering the prompt may lead to errors, so this pattern facilitates the repeated application of a prompt, with or without further user input, automating the generation of multiple outputs.
The Visualization Generator Pattern is designed to leverage text generation capabilities to create visual representations of concepts. This pattern addresses the limitation of large language models (LLMs), which typically produce only text and cannot generate images. By generating input specifically formatted for visualization tools such as Graphviz Dot or DALL-E, this pattern creates a pathway for LLM outputs to be transformed into diagrams or images that enhance understanding. The user may need to specify the types of visualizations required, such as bar charts, directed graphs, or UML class diagrams, to ensure clarity and relevance.
The Game Play Pattern is designed to create interactive games centered around a specific theme, utilizing the capabilities of a language model (LLM) to guide gameplay. Users define limited game rules, while the LLM generates content, scenarios, and challenges based on those rules. This pattern is especially effective when there are broad content areas but restricted gameplay mechanics. By using contextual prompts, users can specify the game theme and its fundamental rules, allowing the LLM to craft engaging scenarios or questions that require problem-solving skills and creativity.
The Refusal Breaker Pattern is designed to assist users in reformulating their questions when a language model (LLM) refuses to provide an answer. This pattern addresses situations where the LLM may reject questions due to a lack of understanding or knowledge. By explaining the reasons for refusal and suggesting alternative phrasings, this pattern encourages users to think critically about their queries and improve their question formulation.
The Context Manager Pattern enables users to control the context in which a conversation with a Large Language Model (LLM) occurs. By specifying or removing certain contextual elements, users can guide the LLM to focus on relevant topics or exclude irrelevant ones. This pattern is particularly useful for maintaining relevance and coherence in conversations, helping to avoid disruptions in the flow of dialogue. Users can provide explicit instructions such as “Please consider X” or “Ignore Y” to fine-tune the LLM’s responses. Clarity and specificity are key to ensuring the LLM understands the intended scope and generates accurate answers.